Top Ten Most Boring Aircraft in History!
Boredom is in the eye, or perhaps gall bladder, of the beholder. When I was growing up in Norfolk (my origin proving my credentials for this task) I thought that the pairs of A-10s that flew over every day were extremely dull. They were commonplace, quiet, and neither a super-exciting fast jet like a Jaguar nor something lovely and old like a Tiger Moth. Now I realise the A-10 is one of the most interesting military aircraft ever built and if one were to hove into view now I would run outside and stare at it until it went away. However, some aircraft are just so dull that no human anywhere could ever truly find the energy to run outside and look at them. Could they? Well, probably. But here’s some likely contenders for that accolade, if it were truly attainable. Ironically I have tried to make this list a bit more, well, interesting by selecting the most boring aircraft from various aspects of aviation history, otherwise the whole list would be Airbuses. And that would be boring. Now I’m boring myself.
To bore others with articles like this use the donate buttons above and below. I’m utterly uninterested in your generosity.
10. Curtiss P-40: Borehawk
Inherently military aircraft can’t help but be generally more interesting than civil ones and of military aircraft the fighter is obviously the most glamorous. The most intense period in the history of fighter aircraft is the Second World War, so selecting the most boring example from the most thrilling group of aircraft at the most exciting time for aircraft seems like a pointlessly difficult task but I believe I have achieved the definitive answer:
The Curtiss P-40 was neither particularly fast nor particularly manoeuvrable and it was not effective at high altitude. Its design was not unusual, unlike its fascinating contemporaries the P-38 and P-39, and it was itself a derivative of an earlier, rarer and more historically interesting aircraft, the Hawk 75. Subsequently, halfway through its production life it was heavily redesigned to become, seemingly, even more mediocre.
Some aircraft are interesting due to the nation that produced them (ie Italy) but no such luck for the Warhawk. It cannot be considered unusual due to rarity, the P-40 was produced in great numbers but on the other hand, not so great as many other fighters. In no theatre to which it was committed could it definitively be said to have been the best fighter available on one side or the other but generally comes out sort-of second or third best. Never totally outclassed though – that would have made it notable. Its long career (it was only retired by Brazil in the mid-fifties, which is edging into dangerously potentially interesting territory) was not so long as the Corsair or the Mustang, and was generally competent. The P-40 can claim no superlative nor was it found spectacularly wanting in any regard. It represents the greatest triumph of mediocrity during the war years. Perhaps not coincidentally it is one of my favourite aircraft.
9. Beriev Be-30/32: Soviet Yawnion
Has any other nation so consistently produced more interesting aircraft than the Soviet Union? Either because they were absolutely brilliant or because they were just so awful. Anyway, just to prove that aerial ennui is not the sole preserve of the Imperialist West here is the Beriev Be-30, an aircraft whose sole claim to fame is its limited production run (of eight, which makes it pretty successful by modern British standards ho ho). Looking a little like a genetically modified Twin Otter (how often have you heard that tired old line?) the Be-30 chugged around for a while competing unsuccessfully with the Let-410 and flirting with being mass-produced in Romania until it quietly died without anyone really noticing.
8. Schweizer X-26 Frigate: I feel the need, the need for a safe yaw/roll-coupling training platform
Research aircraft are usually spectacular and dangerous, sometimes awe-inspiring like the X-15 or less so like the Bristol 188, but invariably exciting right? Picture the scene: you are a hotshot US Naval aviator and you’ve just been assigned to the Naval Test Pilot’s School. Perhaps you’ll fly the new Super Crusader and mock dogfight with F-4s, or maybe you’ll get on the D-558 programme and fly several times the speed of sound at the edge of space, or maybe it’ll be something absurd and memorable like the Ryan Vertijet. Imagine your reaction therefore on being presented with the X-26A, a Schweizer Frigate glider which differs from the standard Schweizer SGS 2-32 glider mostly by having the word ‘Navy’ painted on the side. “It doesn’t even have an engine!” you manage to wail before being told to get out there and push the yaw/roll coupling envelope (slowly).
7. Vickers Varsity: It existed
Training aircraft are usually pretty dull and so are most airliners. The Varsity combined these two groups to singularly uninteresting effect whilst also managing to be an uninspiring development of a fairly boring military derivative of a not particularly interesting airliner. Try to think of something interesting about it. Go on.
How dare you consider clicking off this list of boring planes- if however you do, have a look at 10 Best fighters of World War II , top WVR and BVR fighters of today, an interview with a Super Hornet pilot and a Pacifist’s Guide to Warplanes. Was the Spitfire overrated? Want something more bizarre? The Top Ten fictional aircraft is a fascinating read, as is The Strange Story and The Planet Satellite. The Fashion Versus Aircraft Camo is also a real cracker. Those interested in the Cold Way should read A pilot’s guide to flying and fighting in the Lightning. Those feeling less belligerent may enjoy A pilot’s farewell to the Airbus A340. Looking for something more humourous? Have a look at this F-35 satire and ‘Werner Herzog’s Guide to pusher bi-planes. In the mood for something more offensive? Try the NSFW 10 best looking American airplanes, or the same but for Canadians.
6. McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle : Filthy shades of Grey
(Note from Editor: Are we still using fifty shades jokes? Jesus)
…oh ok, how about ‘Bored of Prey‘?
I bet people will disagree with this one but the F-15 is by far the world’s most boring fast jet. For starters it comes from the world’s least interesting nation in terms of military aircraft production. It’s not old enough to be interesting like the F-4, nor is it new enough like the Typhoon. Its undeniable success is dull. A 100-0 ‘kill’ ratio isn’t interesting, it just reflects the fact that the USAF and Israel haven’t engaged anyone with a genuinely competitive air force since the F-15 entered service (or indeed for several years beforehand). For a brief moment in 2007, it looked like the F-15 might suddenly get interesting after one broke up in mid-air for no apparent reason (a la de Havilland Comet) leading to a worldwide grounding. As it turned out the fleet was fine and the ultimate reason for the midair failure was the most tepid one can possibly imagine: ‘a longeron did not meet specifications’. Gee. And it looks boring. The F-15 pioneered the oh-so-tedious ‘you can have any colour you like so long as it’s grey’ trend for air-superiority fighters that seems to be totally obligatory these days. Even so the F-15’s dullness remains, to me at least, inexplicable, it should be thrilling but it isn’t. F-14 and F-16: exciting.
F-15: capable. Yawn.
5. TSR.2: Tedious Speculative Rants (2)
See also Avro Arrow, Mirage 4000 and countless other ‘potential world beaters’.
The TSR2 was, in itself, an interesting aircraft, big, fast, advanced, and ultimately doomed. However no other aircraft (in the UK at least) has provoked such a tireless and seemingly infinite stream of invective and speculation. All that can be said with impunity was that the development of a promising British aircraft was cancelled. This act (which is, let’s face it, hardly unprecedented in the annals of British aviation) has resulted in literally millions of words in books and magazines and on forums and websites and blogs that go on and on and on and on and on. All of it saying basically the same thing over and over again. Thus an aircraft that should be a fascinating footnote of postwar British aviation has been damned by tedious angry bores (such as myself) and their tedious angry opinions (such as my own) to annoying tiresome ubiquity.
4. Robinson R66: Whirlybored
Robinson helicopters are cheap, commonplace and easy to identify, lumbered as they are with a big stick on top holding up the rotors like a rubbish flying unicorn. The only thing that makes them interesting is their reliance on piston engines in what is now an almost universally turboshaft driven field. Their relatively new R66 removes even that mildly non-soporific element by being a turboshaft powered update of the R44 and thus can justly lay claim to the title of dullest rotorcraft to date.
R66 pilots note: Happy to recant this in exchange for rides in your helicopter.
3. Piper PA-28: Private Plain
Familiarity breeds contempt. There’s thousands of these things flying around but if one went past would you be able to identify it? Of course not – mainly because you don’t care but also because it looks incredibly similar to a whole bunch of other small private aircraft. To add insult to injury and to encourage you to care even less, the basic PA-28 sometimes has retractable undercarriage fitted and occasionally a T-tail. If a small high-wing aircraft that looks like a Cessna 172 flies past, chances are it actually is one, what with the 172 being the most produced aircraft of all time (which is pretty spectacular). With the PA-28, well yes, it could indeed be a PA-28 but there’s at least a dozen other aircraft that look basically identical. The Piper gets the nod in the boring stakes by being the most commonplace of these. Also I’ve flown one and it made me feel ill.
2. Boeing 737: Malaisen Airlines
Any lingering glamour that airline flying can still command is daily being eroded by the Boeing 737. What is worse is that the ubiquity of the 737 and its concomitant dullness has started to spill over into other areas of life. Southwest Airlines of Dallas operate ‘no-frills’ services using solely Boeing 737s and is spectacularly successful. The so-called ‘Southwest model’ is currently rather popular in the business world and espouses making any given service as simple and uninteresting as possible so that it may be delivered at the lowest possible price for maximum return. The 737 is at the heart of this policy and key to its success. The Boeing 737 is, therefore, making all things in the world simpler and duller and more profitable and worse.
1. Airbus A320 (family): Born Toulouse
It’s a tight contest for the top spot but claiming the Beige medal is the fantastically mundane Airbus which just nudges the 737 into second place by dint of the fact that the 737 is the world’s most produced jet airliner (which could be considered interesting), and on account of the name ‘Airbus’ which was specifically chosen to remove any semblance of residual excitement that might be inherently retained by a flying machine. It is neither the most successful nor the largest nor the smallest nor the least successful nor the safest nor the most unsafe nor the fastest nor the loudest nor the quietest nor the longest-ranged twin jet airliner flying today.
The A320 pioneered the civil application of such dull technologies as fly-by-wire and the side stick controller, both of which serve to make piloting the aircraft less interesting and which have subsequently been adopted by other seemingly more exciting aircraft.
As thrilling as the European Economic Area that it so competently represents and serves, the A320 is a reassuring triumph of modern dullness in an increasingly interesting world and for that it should, perhaps, be discreetly celebrated.
Ed ‘Ennui’ Ward is currently lying on the kitchen floor looking at out of the patio window at a rain-sodden suburban lawn.
To bore others with articles like this use the donate buttons above and below. I’m utterly uninterested in your generosity.
Follow my vapour trail on Twitter: @Hush_kit
If you enjoyed this I slapped a load of links about twenty centimetres above this. Alright I repeat them below too as I’m in a good mood: 10 Best fighters of World War II , top WVR and BVR fighters of today, an interview with a Super Hornet pilot and a Pacifist’s Guide to Warplanes. Was the Spitfire overrated? Want something more bizarre? The Top Ten fictional aircraft is a fascinating read, as is The Strange Story and The Planet Satellite. The Fashion Versus Aircraft Camo is also a real cracker. Those interested in the Cold Way should read A pilot’s guide to flying and fighting in the Lightning. Those feeling less belligerent may enjoy A pilot’s farewell to the Airbus A340. Looking for something more humourous? Have a look at this F-35 satire and ‘Werner Herzog’s Guide to pusher bi-planes. In the mood for something more offensive? Try the NSFW 10 best looking American airplanes, or the same but for Canadians.
“If you have any interest in aviation, you’ll be surprised, entertained and fascinated by Hush-Kit – the world’s best aviation blog”. Rowland White, author of the best-selling ‘Vulcan 607’
I’ve selected the richest juiciest cuts of Hush-Kit, added a huge slab of new unpublished material, and with Unbound, I want to create a beautiful coffee-table book. Pre-order your copy now right here
TO AVOID DISAPPOINTMENT PRE-ORDER YOUR COPY NOW
From the cocaine, blood and flying scarves of World War One dogfighting to the dark arts of modern air combat, here is an enthralling ode to these brutally exciting killing machines.
The Hush-Kit Book of Warplanes is a beautifully designed, highly visual, collection of the best articles from the fascinating world of military aviation –hand-picked from the highly acclaimed Hush-kit online magazine (and mixed with a heavy punch of new exclusive material). It is packed with a feast of material, ranging from interviews with fighter pilots (including the English Electric Lightning, stealthy F-35B and Mach 3 MiG-25 ‘Foxbat’), to wicked satire, expert historical analysis, top 10s and all manner of things aeronautical, from the site described as:
“the thinking-man’s Top Gear… but for planes”.
The solid well-researched information about aeroplanes is brilliantly combined with an irreverent attitude and real insight into the dangerous romantic world of combat aircraft.
- Interviews with pilots of the F-14 Tomcat, Mirage, Typhoon, MiG-25, MiG-27, English Electric Lighting, Harrier, F-15, B-52 and many more.
- Engaging Top (and bottom) 10s including: Greatest fighter aircraft of World War II, Worst British aircraft, Worst Soviet aircraft and many more insanely specific ones.
- Expert analysis of weapons, tactics and technology.
- A look into art and culture’s love affair with the aeroplane.
- Bizarre moments in aviation history.
- Fascinating insights into exceptionally obscure warplanes.
The book will be a stunning object: an essential addition to the library of anyone with even a passing interest in the high-flying world of warplanes, and featuring first-rate photography and a wealth of new world-class illustrations.
Rewards levels include these packs of specially produced trump cards.
Pre-order your copy now right here
I can only do it with your support.
Definitely an interesting idea for a post. But I think you invalidate yourself by not having the Cessna 172 or DC-9 families!
We’ve tried to avoid aircraft with superlative achievements, which rules out the 150/172
The TSR2 wing loading isnt really atrocious, it was a delta so the span was small but it had more wing area than the contemporary F-111.
TSR@ wing703ft2 compared to F-111 657 ft2 spread and 525 ft2 swept.( but longer span FB-111 would be more area)
As well the engines were 30,600lb t/o thrust with AB while even the FB-111A was only 20,350 lb
The RA5 Vigilante was 754ft2 (700ft2 for earlier A5)
Theres much that people get wrong ( boosters and detractors) about TSR2
Hi Duker, Here’s a quote from ‘TSR2 with hindsight’: “TSR2 reflected the compromises largely brought about by
the requirement for supersonic performance and ‘the myth’ of ride quality at low level requiring high wing loading. TSR2 did indeed have a small wing and very high wing loading, about 50% greater than Buccaneer, and lift dependent drag and induced drag were poor for the high level cruise case.”
Interesting paper, Id heard about that conference so its good its online. The replies to that comment about the ‘myth’ shows that a subsonic plane will have different loadings than that for a transonic and the design of F-111 bears this out
. The later Tornado has even higher wing loadings so maybe it wasnt a myth and one mans opinion was wrong. It seems too that mid altitude bombing wasnt a requirement, but reconnaissance was.
The best plane to compare with Buccaneer was the US Intruder and you find similar wing loadings.
The other point is maximum takeoff weight is used mostly for ferry mission with extra fuel, so normal combat requirements arent observed.
I am pleased that in an article that suggests a Vickers Varsity might have consensual sex with the cartoon character ‘Jimbo’, it is seen as important that the relative level of wing-loading of the TSR.2 be correctly reported. All is well with the world.
No discussion of boring airplanes can ignore the 20-years-late DC-3 clone named, really truly, the “Accountant”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aviation_Traders_Accountant
The only thing not interesting about the Accountant is its name! And even that is kind of crazy in a world of Starliners and Viscounts. The tale of Aviation Traders’ Accountant is a fascinating rollercoaster ride of weird and total failure, from the sheer chutzpah of Freddie Laker believing he could replace the DC-3 whilst having no industrial base whatsoever to the fact that the front wheel wouldn’t retract completely. The mere fact that it existed at all is insane and I would contend that it is possibly the most interesting postwar British civil aircraft.
That **is** interesting. What’s the story with the landing gear — was the non-retraction a design error, or intentional? I always thought the technology of retractable landing gear was pretty well established by the 1950’s.
Thats very ‘boring’ – but interesting too. You could do a series on DC3 replacements- that werent!
But of course the real DC-3 replacement had to wait till turbofans and the Soviet Yak 40. The western world had moved up by then but the vast Soviet Union needed a rugged 24-30 passenger workhorse
I would have just out the current crop of airliners as all bloody boring
Beriev 32: A genetically modified Twin Otter? To me, it looks more like an inebriate first generation Shinkansen bullet train which took to the air, and, well, missed.
A-ha! What about the use of the P-40 by the Flying Tigers…somewhat more interesting than just plain boring?
While I agree with the list (more our less), I wonder why it does not include Folland Gnat and Iskra trainer. Both were as nondescript as one can stretch one’s imagination. Both were used majorly by only two airforces and, no one cried when they made their tedious way into the sunset. The only thing they achieved was making up the numbers.
You busted the balls of the F-15 Eagle but left out the Tornado (which you mentioned). The Tornado was supposed to be all things to all nations and proved itself to be a ‘jack of all trades and master of none”. The Tornado is a P-40 Borehawk with 2 jets and a boring paint job (Hell, even the p-40 got a shark’s mouth). You even stated that the F-15 has never been defeated in air-to-air combat. The Tornado is written about in books that set on bedside table so you can read and sleep more soundly than if you had taken benzodiazepines and alcohol. The Tornado is the ultimate jet-propelled yawnfest.
Tornado did kill rather a lot of its pilots in exciting ways did it not?
Imagine my delight on finding out Turkish airlines were taking me all the way from Manchester to Kenya – on an A320, then a 737. 9 hours on a 737. In the dark.
This is a truly wonderful list. But it errs on the side of interesting. That Viking aircraft is rather cuddly when you look at it a certain way. And I felt sorry for the Piper after your description. But your omission of any executive jets is troubling. Are you saying you find Cessna Citation or Bombardier Dotards interesting?
Living near the approach to Heathrow, I agree about the Boeing 737 and Airbus 320 series: they are boring and there are thousands of them. Moreover, they have spawned mini-clones in the Embraer 170/175 and 190/195 and the Bombardier C100 and C300, and Sukhoi and that Chinese firm whose name I can’t recall have got in on the act too. And then Airbus has decided to clone the A330 with the A350, and they take a lot of close observation to tell apart. Thankfully, we get the A-380s, Boeing 747s and even the occasional A-340 to show that airliners can have more than two motors. (And I do have my memories of the 1960s and 1970s, when there was a lot more variation in airliner designs.)
The 737 just got a little more interesting today, dinnit.
The 737 just got a LOT more interesting this month. I suspect Boeing would rather it hadn’t. As would some 300 passengers and aircrew.
the “super” hornet is by far more boring than the Eagle IMO. “Less everything-but-especially-maintenance than a Tomcat” is its selling point. the Eagle could only be considered mildly boring by virtue, ie perfection
the TSR.2 could only be called boring by someone who thinks of airplanes all day and night for several decades ie it speaks volumes about the author, not the aircraft. it would be like calling the SR-71 boring. assuming you wish to stay in the same general wheelhouse of aviation I suggest instead the Javelin, which could perhaps most interestingly be deigned “the F-102 of England”