Planet Satellite: British super-plane or magnesium flop?

sea_water_plane

Image credit: http://blog.modernmechanix.com/mags

I was wrong. I wanted to write about the Planet Satellite because I thought it was merely an obscure, attractive failure. However, the more I researched the Satellite’s story, the more bizarre it became.

00e4b1a35ab1cbe68ae61aed6547da49The 1948 Planet Satellite was an unusual and very beautiful aeroplane. Its appearance suggested that Hergé had created it especially for Tintin to steal. The aircraft was the shape of a tear-drop, with a butterfly ‘Y-shaped’ tail. Its ‘hygienically’ clean shape spoke of speed, progress and a utopian future.  The Satellite was a revolutionary design in almost every way. It was a true monocoque design, for those unfamiliar with the term- this does not mean it was single-penised (in fact, the aircraft had no penis). A monocoque structure is supported by its external skin, as opposed to using an internal frame. It is analogous to an invertebrate (such as a beetle), whereas an animal with a normal internal skeleton, like a person, is more like a traditional aircraft. Though many aircraft are described as monocoque, strictly speaking, the vast majority are actually semi-monocoque. The Satellite was a true monocoque design, meaning it was far simpler structurally than any contemporary aircraft. This simplicity could result in an aircraft that was cheap to produce and assemble, with far less to go wrong. These traits were vital as the Satellite was intended to become a flying Model-T Ford.
Following World War Two, Major J. N. D. Heenan (more on him later) went to the United States to study the needs of the general aviation market. He concluded that what was needed was a cheap and quiet aircraft. By adopting the ‘pusher configuration’, with the engine (he would choose a 250-hp Gipsy Queen 32) and propeller behind the cabin, the noise would be significantly reduced for the occupants. This layout would also give the pilot and passengers of the four-seater an excellent, unobstructed view from the cockpit. Additionally, it would allow the nose section to be smooth and aerodynamically efficient.

There was a potentially huge market for the aircraft, notably in the US and Australia. If Planet Aircraft Ltd got it right, tens of thousands of aircraft would be produced and exported across the world.

46-2

Revolutionary design

The Satellite was immensely ambitious, embracing several untried (though extremely promising) technologies. The first hurdle was to master the monocoque. As no bracing members were present, the skin had to be strong enough to keep the fuselage rigid. To get this level of rigidity without the design becoming massively overweight required the use of unusual materials. Major J. N. D. Heenan, the maverick designer of the Satellite, thought the answer was to make it from magnesium (Magnesium-Zirconium to be precise, as Hergé’s Thomson and Thompson would say). The company Magnesium Elektron (ME) came onboard, funding the programme (the company still exists today and builds components for, among other things, the F-22’s gearbox). ME had received enormous orders during World War II and had supplied 10,000 tons of the material in 1943. The post-war period was tough for ME and they were keen to diversify;Heenan was offering them a potentially vast and lucrative inroad into a new generation of all-magnesium aeroplanes. The author approached Magnesium Elektron for information relating to the Satellite, the company declined to reply, we shall see why. ME was a subsidiary of Hughes & Co Ltd, a chemical and plastics company. In 1946, Hughes were bought by Distillers Company Ltd, a Scottish whisky and gin giant, and so the Satellite was to be funded with booze money.
xp56-4

 

 

 

 

Most aircraft manufacturers used aluminium as their primary material, but some of the more maverick aircraft designers saw the potential of magnesium. These non-conformists also tended to put the propeller at the back in the ‘pusher configuration’. In 1943 Northrop flew the XP-56 ‘Black Bullet’, an aircraft that had seemingly flown in from a parallel universe. This bat-winged fighter was an extremely unconventional design and like the later Satellite, was a ‘Magnesium pusher’. The XP-56 proved dangerous to fly, and delays in its testing meant it was still unready at a time when piston-engined fighters were yesterday’s technology. Somebody at Northrop clearly thought the XP-56 was not mad enough and began work on the wonderfully lunatic XP-79, in which the unlucky pilot would have to lie down as he controlled a rocket-propelled flying wing while manoeuvring his aircraft to slice enemy aircraft in half with its leading edges. Despite the benefits of magnesium (it is exceptionally light and strong) it had a reputation for bursting into flames and, if impure, to corrode easily. On its maiden flight on September 12th 1945, the XP-79 spun out of control after seven minutes of flight. Test pilot Harry Crosby bailed out, but was struck by the aircraft and was killed. Shortly afterwards the project was binned.

xp-79b_08

Click here for the story of Britain’s cancelled superfighter

A couple of months later, on 7 Nov 1945, Group Captain H. J. Wilson of the RAF was flying at over 600 mph in his Meteor F.Mk 4. This flight smashed the world air speed record and made a hero of Wilson. Though some Germans had flown faster in World War II, Wilson’s record was the first officially acknowledged speed record since 1939. Prior to the speed record  Hugh ‘Willie’ Wilson had already led a very impressive career. He had been a leading test pilot. He had fought with the RAF’s crack No. 111 Squadron. His skills had been used to test fly captured German aircraft and he had almost been killed as he tried to land a Ju 88 that suffered engine failure on take-off. The speed record was merely the most conspicuous achievement for a man who did much to further the progress of aeronautical science. He then left this world of glory to become test pilot for the fledgling Planet Aircraft company and soon become managing director.

Clean sheet
The Satellite was built in the Robinson Redwing factory at Croydon, Purley Way, Surrey in 1947. Its name, like its appearance, was bold and futuristic. It was not like any other aircraft. The July 15th 1948 issue of Flight found the design ‘startling’ and identified the reason for the designer’s unconventional approach,

Major J. N. D. Heenan, of Heenan, Winn and Steel, consulting engineers, 29, Clarges Street, London, W.1, is the man responsible for the Satellite. It is the first aircraft which he has designed, but, as he himself says, had he ever designed an orthodox aircraft, preconceived ideas would have so trammelled his outlook that the concept of such a design as the Satellite would have been virtually impossible; an argument with which we are inclined to agree.” and further:

“ Beyond stating that the Satellite is so clean aerodynamically
that it almost justifies the term hygienic”

There was a certain genius to choosing a ‘virgin’ aircraft designer, free from conventional wisdom, but is this long-held view of Heenan correct? John Nelson Dundas Heenan is something of a mysterious character that history has largely forgotten. He appeared at, at least, one World One pilots reunion in the 1930s, though it is not believed he had flown in the Great War.

Save the Hush-Kit blog. This site is in peril, we are far behind our funding targets. Our site is absolutely free and we have no advertisements (any you see are from WordPress). If you’ve enjoyed an article you can donate here. 

A trawl of patent records reveals he filed seventeen, most relating to heaters and boilers; one, somewhat bizarrely, relates to an improved golf club bag. The solitary patent relating to aircraft is from 1949 and describes a radical fuselage framework structure requiring far fewer parts than conventional designs. He was also actively interested in metallurgy from the 1930s.

The idea of Heenan being an aviation outsider is a myth; in fact Heenan was a vital part of the secret project which led to America’s first jet aircraft. Heenan was involved in the British Air Commission in World War II and communicated a vast amount of Frank Whittle’s reports on jet propulsion to USAAF Col D. J. Keirn. Keirn was the AAF Materiel Command project officer, in charge of bringing Britain’s advanced jet technology to the US. With this information, America was able to build and fly its first jet, the P-59A in 1942.
Planet-Satellite

Whisky business
The Satellite, which was yet to fly, was displayed at the 1948 Farnborough. Among the thousands of visitors attracted to the aircraft was a young Bill Gunston who wished he had enough money to buy one for himself. The prototype was taken to Redhill, an aerodrome used by Imperial airways in the 1930s in 1948. It received the registration G-ALOI in April 1949. The aircraft was ready for its first flight, at the able hands of Willie Wilson. He described this event to the Distiller’s Gazette, “After the first Hop which resulted in the undercarriage collapsing, the Air Registration Board called for an investigation into the stressing. After numerous delays, the machine was prepared for a second hop to about 20 ft, then executed what I thought to be quite a reasonable landing. When, on inspection, it was found that the main keel had broken, that really brought the wrath of the ARB upon us, insisting that the aircraft had to be completely re-stressed…my own view was that we should, in the old phrase, ‘jack up the windscreen and run a new aeroplane underneath’, and I recommended to Distillers that they pack up the venture and sack H. J. Wilson. To give them their due they appreciated my endeavours and did very kindly offer me a job in one of their divisions; but I considered that the profession of flogging whisky was probably more dangerous than test flying!”

Click here for the story of Italy’s cancelled superfighter

Sadly, this site will pause operations if it does not hit its funding targets. If you’ve enjoyed an article you can donate here.

So what had gone wrong? In designing the Satellite, Heenan had sent a wing section to the National Physical Laboratory for testing, as some believed magnesium had insufficient torsional strength. The results were very encouraging. The section withstood ten million deflection cycles at 10 per cent of the maximum bending load on the wing. When deflection was increased to 40 per cent a further two million cycles were experienced before failure occurred. Tragically the same tests had not been carried out on keel member and undercarriage points.

Click here for the story of Convair’s insane ring-wing fighter
An unlikely venture
Two Satellite prototypes were built, but the project was cancelled shortly afterwards. However, the story of this gin-funded, magnesium weirdo was not over. Major Heenan’s rich imagination bore an even more outlandish plan: in 1951 the Heenan, Winn and Steel company began converting the Satellite prototype G-ALXP into an experimental helicopter! Heenan had purchased the rights to a helicopter concept first developed by the American designer Fred Landgraf, creator of the Landgraf H-2. Unlike any other helicopter before or since the H-2 used a tension-rod drive system to drive side-by-side rotors. Pitch of the freely rotating blade shells was controlled by ailerons close to the tips of the rotors.
In 1952, Firth Helicopters started construction of what was now known as the Firth FH-01/4, but it proved to be a nightmare. Numerous problems dogged the project, which seemed impossible to solve given the small size of the company’s resources. The helicopter was cancelled before it had reached a flight-worthy stage. What did exist of the Firth FH-01/4 was presented to the College of Aeronautics at Cranfield in 1955. The story of the Satellite was now over, but its configuration would return.

Satellite of love

85f1a39c-c396-4743-a7bb-d4fa1a447695

The Lear Fan was a product of love. When the aircraft’s creator Bill Lear died in 1978, his devoted wife Moya did all she could to see the project succeed. Bill Lear was a great innovator, his inventions included the 8-track tape and the Lear Jet. He also had a whimsical sense of humour, naming one of his daughters ‘Shanda’ (Shanda Lear!).

Moya was a former dancer, turned philanthropist and her father was the vaudeville genius John ‘Ole’ Olsen, creator of the broadway smash ‘Hellzapoppin’. As an aside, Moya and Bill’s son John Lear is one of the world’s most accomplished pilots and an ardent believer in the earthly presence of extraterrestrials.

Moya knew her late husband’s design was a winner, and aggressively pursued investors.
In configuration, the gorgeous LearFan was reminiscent of the Satellite. It was a pusher, and had the same Y-shaped tail. Like the Satellite it was innovative in its choice of construction and materials, and was one of the first aircraft to use large amounts of composite plastics.

The LearFan is officially recorded as making its first flight on the 32nd December 1980. The bizarre ‘date’ was an attempt to grant the project funding despite it technically being a day too late to be eligible. Like the Satellite, the LearFan was a case of too much too soon. It used two engines to power one propeller, making it as aerodynamically clean as a single-engined aircraft, but as reliable as a twin. The Federal Aviation Administration (the US organisation which ensures aircraft are safe), did not like this design as it put a lot of strain on the gearbox and would not give it their stamp of approval. The Lear Fan was abandoned in 1985, and Moya died in 2001.

Save the Hush-Kit blog. This site is in peril, we are far behind our funding targets. Our site is absolutely free and we have no advertisements (any you see are from WordPress). If you’ve enjoyed an article you can donate here. 

The celebrated aviation writer Bill Sweetman noted (in an article for Air & Space) that:

The LearFan ran out of cash before the problems were solved, but it left a historic echo. With its slender wings, pusher propeller, and Y-tail, the LearFan resembles today’s Reaper drone—and Linden Blue, co-owner of the Reaper’s maker, General Atomics, was the last CEO of LearFan. I’m not sure it’s a coincidence.”

0206026_2

So was this the end of the ‘Y- pusher’?
In 2001 a new age of aerial warfare began. The US invaded Afghanistan, and the drone became the symbol of war in the ‘Information Age’. Just four weeks into 2001, a sinister aircraft had taken its maiden flight, the General Atomics MQ-9 Reaper. The Reaper was the first of a new breed of remotely piloted combat air vehicles. That the Reaper chose a similar design solution to the Satellite, with a Y-shaped tail and pusher engine, is a vindication of Major Heenan and his visionary little aeroplane. The coming of the Reaper was going to be the end of this story.

Until, I uncovered something very strange.

090127-F-7383P-001

Shute and ask questions later
Neville Shute Norway was an aeronautical engineer and author of fiction when he joined the Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve in World War II. Earlier, he had worked on the famous R.100 airship with Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb. In 1931 he set up the Airspeed Ltd aircraft company, along with A. H. Tiltman, a friend from the R.100 project. Thanks to his immensely creative thinking Norway ended up in what would become the Directorate of Miscellaneous Weapons Development. The madcap DMWD were encouraged to think outside the box in developing ways to counter Nazi Germany. Their hare-brained, yet often successful, schemes included coating the sea in coal dust so, from the air, it appeared to be land. Norway himself was involved in the development of the ‘The Great Panjandrum’ of 1943. This was an enormous set of rocket-propelled wheels, full of a ton of explosives designed to blow a tank-size hole through the German coastal defences. The Great Panjandrum, named for a character in nonsense poem, proved a surprising performer. It was described by Brian Johnson, for the BBC documentary Secret War,
“At first all went well. Panjandrum rolled into the sea and began to head for the shore, the Brass Hats watching through binoculars from the top of a pebble ridge…Then a clamp gave: first one, then two more rockets broke free: Panjandrum began to lurch ominously. It hit a line of small craters in the sand and began to turn to starboard, careering towards Klemantaski, who, viewing events through a telescopic lens, misjudged the distance and continued filming. Hearing the approaching roar he looked up from his viewfinder to see Panjandrum, shedding live rockets in all directions, heading straight for him. As he ran for his life, he glimpsed the assembled admirals and generals diving for cover behind the pebble ridge into barbed-wire entanglements. Panjandrum was now heading back to the sea but crashed on to the sand where it disintegrated in violent explosions, rockets tearing across the beach at great speed.”. The unlikeliness of this device has led some to conclude that this project’s primary objective was to distract German Intelligence from Britain’s real invasion-planning efforts.

For Norway’s connection with the Satellite we need to delve further back, to his 1940 plan for a parasitical torpedo bomber. Buried away in a folder in Nuffield College Library, Oxford is a folder containing  text, with accompanying diagrams and drawings. The documents describe a proposal for the construction in the USA of  ‘a large Amphibian Flying Boat, capable of carrying  four “Satellite” planes, each capable of carrying its own 18″ torpedo or one 1500 lb.  “Diving Bomb”‘. The typescript was originally contained in a plastic folder labelled ‘Burney Amphibian and Satellites’. The concept is from the mind of Neville Shute. What is striking is not just the name of the parasitical torpedo bombers, but the configuration- they are ‘pushers’, with an overall similar configuration to Heenan’s aircraft.

Burney TBF

Could Heenan’s work in advanced projects at the British Air Commission have given him access to this project? It is certainly possible. If this is the case, then could it be Heenan’s naming of the aircraft was a wry reference to Shute’s secret torpedo bomber? The link is at best speculative, but there is another link between Heenan and Shute. Don Middleton, who until he passed away, was the leading authority on the Planet Satellite, was also an ex-Airspeed employee.

Burney Amphib

We will leave the last word on the Satellite to Wilson from the previously quoted interview in the DCL Gazette:

The machine was probably the way ahead of its time, it was built in the wrong material, definitely understressed but otherwise possibly delightful…In case the  Distillers should take the above as criticism, may I state that currently I am testing their Gordon’s gin and Black Label whisky, both of which I find handle extremely well and fully meet their advertised performance.”

The author would like to add that his favourite gin is Hendrick’s.

You should may also enjoy our Top Tens! There’s a whole feast of fantastic BritishFrenchSwedishAustralian, Japanese , Belgian,  German and Latin American aeroplanes. Want something more bizarre? The Top Ten fictional aircraft is a fascinating read.

Save the Hush-Kit blog. This site is in peril, we are far behind our funding targets. Our site is absolutely free and we have no advertisements (any you see are from WordPress). If you’ve enjoyed an article you can donate here. 

221 comments

  1. Pingback: Top Ten Barely Known World War II Aircraft With the Longest Names That Hardly Anybody Has Ever Built a Model Of or Seen In a Movie | Hush-Kit
  2. Pingback: Planet Satellite: An aeronautical engineer responds | Hush-Kit
  3. Pingback: Flying and fighting in the Lightning | Hush-Kit
  4. Pingback: 10 things you always wanted to know about planes, but were afraid to ask | Hush-Kit
  5. Pingback: Su-24 shootdown, thermobaric weapons and chaos: analysis of Russian air power in Syria | Hush-Kit
  6. Pingback: Dismantling the Spitfire myth | Hush-Kit
  7. Pingback: Hush-Kit
  8. Pingback: Too few RAF aircraft to make a difference in Syria? | Hush-Kit
  9. Pingback: Typhoon versus Rafale: The final word | Hush-Kit
  10. Pingback: Why the Spitfire’s place in history of World War II should be challenged. | Hush-Kit
  11. Pingback: Top Twelve Contra-Rotating Lunatics | Hush-Kit
  12. Pingback: The 14 most attractive Canadian aeroplanes | Hush-Kit
  13. Pingback: Spitfire contretemps: Part 4 | Hush-Kit
  14. Pingback: The Top Recce-fighters | Hush-Kit
  15. Pingback: The Hush-Kit A-Z of aviation | Hush-Kit
  16. Pingback: RAILDATE – your free weekly guide to what’s happening, what’s new and what’s on.(Courtesy: Howard Sprenger) – Rail Tube
  17. Pingback: Au Revoir A340: Ian Black bids a fond farewell to a European giant | Hush-Kit
  18. Pingback: Clipped wings: Superb aircraft that the US stymied  | Hush-Kit
  19. Pingback: Hush-Kit bottom ten: The ten worst carrier aircraft | Hush-Kit
  20. Pingback: Werner Herzog’s guide to pusher aircraft | Hush-Kit
  21. Pingback: Air Combat Memoirs Of The Iranian Air Force Pilots: Iranian Air Force Pilots In Combat | Hush-Kit
  22. Pingback: The Hawker Typhoon: Britain’s Butcher Bird (Part 1) 1 | Hush-Kit
  23. Pingback: Is Antonov really dead? | Hush-Kit
  24. Pingback: Top Ten Most Boring Aircraft in History! | Hush-Kit
  25. Pingback: International air tattoos | Hush-Kit
  26. Pingback: Hush-Kit Top Ten: Ten coolest cancelled helicopters | Hush-Kit
  27. Pingback: A cad’s guide to aeroplanes | Hush-Kit
  28. Pingback: Why you shouldn’t park under Ukrainian monuments | Hush-Kit
  29. Pingback: Most F-35 technologies will be added to existing fighters | Hush-Kit
  30. Pingback: Plane adverts | Hush-Kit
  31. Pingback: The ten worst British military aircraft | Hush-Kit
  32. Pingback: Hush-Kit Top Ten: The Ten Best Fighters of World War II | Hush-Kit
  33. Pingback: Hush-Kit Top Ten: The ten best-looking Chinese aircraft | Hush-Kit
  34. Pingback: The 11 worst X-planes | Hush-Kit
  35. Pingback: Aviation: Good reads | Hush-Kit
  36. Pingback: The F-15 that never was: The North American NA-335 | Hush-Kit
  37. Pingback: Su-35 versus Typhoon: Analysis from RUSI’s Justin Bronk | Hush-Kit
  38. Pingback: Aviation myth buster 3: The Bermuda Triangle | Hush-Kit
  39. Pingback: Hush-Kit awards for best-looking aircraft in production 2014: Category 11: Amphibious/seaplanes/flying boats | Hush-Kit
  40. Pingback: Fast, low and dirty: The Allison Mustang | Hush-Kit
  41. Pingback: Hush-kit awards for best-looking aircraft in production 2014: Category 1: Fighters | Hush-Kit
  42. Pingback: THE STORY OF A KOREAN MIG ACE: ASCENT by JED MERCURIO | Hush-Kit
  43. Pingback: The 15 most insanely heavyweight fighters of all time | Hush-Kit
  44. Pingback: Expert Level Aviation Quiz: Hush-Kwiz Mk II | Hush-Kit
  45. Pingback: ‘Super Hunter’: Classic British fighter jet to return to production in India | Hush-Kit
  46. Pingback: Interview with a Tornado pilot | Hush-Kit
  47. Pingback: The Ten Greatest Biplane Fighters | Hush-Kit
  48. Pingback: Top ten fighter radars | Hush-Kit
  49. Pingback: Interceptor: How how to fight & survive in Phantom and Tornado | Hush-Kit
  50. Pingback: —————HUSHKIT EXCLUSIVE—————- FRED BUTLER’S FLYING COLOURS —–Fashion Versus Aircraft Camo | Hush-Kit
  51. Pingback: Kick the tyres and light the fires.. pilots and their cliches | Hush-Kit
  52. Pingback: HUSHKIT EXCLUSIVE- INTERVIEW WITH SUPER HORNET PILOT: F/A-18E VERSUS F/A-18C- THE FINAL WORD! | Hush-Kit
  53. Pingback: HUSH-KIT WAR DIARIES: MY DESERT SHIELD FIASCO: THE ADVENTURES OF A DRUNKEN NAVIGATOR | Hush-Kit
  54. Pingback: The Top Ten most formidable piston-engined fighters | Hush-Kit
  55. Pingback: The Top Ten Fighters: 1946 | Hush-Kit
  56. Pingback: The twin fuselage C-5 shuttle transport | Hush-Kit
  57. Pingback: Reunited with a source book of aircraft | Hush-Kit
  58. Pingback: AVON CALLING! THE POWER OF THE AVON JET ENGINE | Hush-Kit
  59. Pingback: The Top Ten Fighters: 1985 | Hush-Kit
  60. Pingback: Before Typhoon: flying the EAP | Hush-Kit
  61. Pingback: Clash of the titans! Airbus A400M Versus Short Belfast | Hush-Kit
  62. Pingback: F-100 Super Sabre: a fighter pilot’s perspective | Hush-Kit
  63. Pingback: Sigmund Freud’s guide to spyplanes | Hush-Kit
  64. Pingback: MY FAVOURITE AEROPLANE IN 200 WORDS #26 Supermarine Walrus by Jane Morton | Hush-Kit
  65. Pingback: HUSH-KIT PRESENTS: THE TOP TEN MOST COMPLETELY WHACKED UNDERCARRIAGES | Hush-Kit
  66. Pingback: Are we there yet? Analysis of the F-35’s current effectiveness by the Royal United Services Institute’s Justin Bronk | Hush-Kit
  67. Pingback: NUCLEAR POWERED AEROPLANES: A GALLERY | Hush-Kit
  68. Pingback: Hush-Kit Top Ten: The ten best-looking Swedish aeroplanes | Hush-Kit
  69. Pingback: Hush-Kit Top Ten: The ten best-looking Soviet aeroplanes | Hush-Kit
  70. Pingback: The ten worst Soviet aircraft | Hush-Kit
  71. Pingback: F-35 selection: Something rotten in the state of Denmark | Hush-Kit
  72. Pingback: The 10 worst US aircraft | Hush-Kit
  73. Pingback: The Empire’s Ironclad: Flying & Fighting in the B-52 | Hush-Kit
  74. Pingback: Hush-Kit Top Ten: The ten best-looking German aeroplanes | Hush-Kit
  75. Pingback: Elsa Andersson: Sweden’s flying farm-girl | Hush-Kit
  76. Pingback: Boeing 787: Pilot’s assessment | Hush-Kit
  77. Pingback: How to turn your MiG-31 into a flying bus | Hush-Kit
  78. Pingback: What is up with the F-35’s wingtip vortices? | Hush-Kit
  79. Pingback: Fighter news round-up: Royal United Services Institute’s Justin Bronk examines the current state of fighter aircraft programmes around the world | Hush-Kit
  80. Pingback: Donald Trump’s reveals radical plan for a more powerful Air Force | Hush-Kit
  81. Pingback: 10 Incredible Soviet Fighter Aircraft that never entered service | Hush-Kit
  82. Pingback: The Great Aviation Nose Quiz | Hush-Kit
  83. Pingback: Top 11 cancelled French aircraft | Hush-Kit
  84. Pingback: Shocking revelation in Indian Rafale fighter jet deal | Hush-Kit
  85. Pingback: True confessions of a plane spotter | Hush-Kit
  86. Pingback: Generation xbox may kill you: Why you SHOULD be afraid of flying | Hush-Kit
  87. Pingback: Ten incredible cancelled military aircraft | Hush-Kit
  88. Pingback: 10 most insane aircraft | Hush-Kit
  89. Pingback: A B-52 pilot’s guide to modern fighters | Hush-Kit
  90. Pingback: Revolution! Interview with USMC Osprey pilot | Hush-Kit
  91. Pingback: From Prancing Stallion to Chubby Ass and back again: The history of Italian fighter planes | Hush-Kit
  92. Pingback: The US Army’s Ring-Wing Transformer: The strange story of the Convair Model 49 | Hush-Kit
  93. Pingback: The secret life of aircraft | Hush-Kit
  94. Pingback: The Phrog of War: Flying the CH-46 | Hush-Kit
  95. Pingback: Avro Vulcan Versus Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit | Hush-Kit
  96. Pingback: The ten best-looking US Navy airplanes | Hush-Kit
  97. Pingback: HUSH-KIT EXCLUSIVE: THE ULTIMATE PISTON-ENGINED FIGHTER: FLYING THE HAWKER SEA FURY by TEST PILOT DAVE EAGLES | Hush-Kit
  98. Pingback: IML Addax: New Zealand’s design for a super fighter | Hush-Kit
  99. Pingback: HUSH-KIT TOP TEN: 10 MOST EVIL-LOOKING AIRCRAFT | Hush-Kit
  100. Pingback: Flying the flag: What do aircraft mean to us? | Hush-Kit
  101. Pingback: Great footage of vertical take-off in the Doak VZ-4 | Hush-Kit
  102. Pingback: Chinese stealth: What can we learn from the J-20’s Zhuhai debut? | Hush-Kit
  103. Pingback: Fiendishly Hard Aircraft Quiz 3 | Hush-Kit
  104. Pingback: My favourite plane in 200 words #5: BAe 146 by Caroline Kiernan | Hush-Kit
  105. Pingback: MY FAVOURITE AEROPLANE IN 200 WORDS #21 Boeing 737 by Clementine Norton | Hush-Kit
  106. Pingback: My favourite aeroplane in 200 words #2: Blackburn Buccaneer by Dr. Raymond N. Wolejko, MD | Hush-Kit
  107. Pingback: The Rafale and Peter Collins | Hush-Kit
  108. Pingback: Top ten jump-jets | Hush-Kit
  109. Pingback: Ten most formidable dogfight missiles | Hush-Kit
  110. Pingback: A bomber pilot selects the Top Ten Cold War Bombers | Hush-Kit
  111. Pingback: The 10 coolest cancelled airliners | Hush-Kit
  112. Pingback: Could Europe survive a war against the US? | Hush-Kit
  113. Pingback: The untold story of the Heinkel He 546 Nazi superbomber | Hush-Kit
  114. Pingback: Shark’s teeth! A gallery of planes with bite | Hush-Kit
  115. Pingback: Top 8 Mach 3 fighters | Hush-Kit
  116. Pingback: McDonnell 220 Business Jet Promo Film – 1963 | Hush-Kit
  117. Pingback: Axed! The trillion dollar list of shame: The Ten Most Expensive Cancelled Aircraft | Hush-Kit
  118. Pingback: The barrel and the griffon- Saab J 29 Tunnan and JAS 39 Gripen compared: Part 1 | Hush-Kit
  119. Pingback: Bizarre trippy educational film from Lockheed (1969) | Hush-Kit
  120. Pingback: Hunters over Peru! | Hush-Kit
  121. Pingback: Saab J 29 Tunnan and JAS 39 Gripen compared: Part 2 – Time twins | Hush-Kit
  122. Pingback: Broken boomerangs: Ten forward swept wing aircraft that never were | Hush-Kit
  123. Pingback: The top fighter aircraft of 2017 (BVR combat) | Hush-Kit
  124. Pingback: Expert level aircraft identification quiz | Hush-Kit
  125. Pingback: 10 Worst French aircraft | Hush-Kit
  126. Pingback: Flying the F-4 Phantom II, British-style | Hush-Kit
  127. Pingback: The MAKS airshow: Russian aviation in breathtaking photos | Hush-Kit
  128. Pingback: An idiot’s guide to Chinese Flankers | Hush-Kit
  129. Pingback: A Crook in Russia: Our man at Zhukovsky air show | Hush-Kit
  130. Pong's avatar
    Pong

    The morthrop xp79 was never intended to ram. Thats a bit of an urban legend that has since been thoroughly debunked (see thr youtube video from peninsula seniors where the northop historian dismantles that myth). Thanks for an interesting read.

  131. Pingback: How to kill a Raptor  | Hush-Kit
  132. Pingback: 10 incredible cancelled Westland aircraft | Hush-Kit
  133. Pingback: Four military aircraft myths you shouldn’t believe | Hush-Kit
  134. Pingback: What crashed near Area 51 last week? | Hush-Kit
  135. Pingback: What-if: Siamese Supermarine- The Twin Spitfire | Hush-Kit
  136. Pingback: The Hawker Siddeley P.1154: BRITAIN’S SUPERSONIC JUMP-JET | Hush-Kit
  137. Pingback: Cold War Eagle Driver: F-15 pilot reveals all | Hush-Kit
  138. Pingback: F-15 versus Tomcat (and Phantom and F-16) | Hush-Kit
  139. Pingback: Hush-Kit Top Ten: Top 10 planes I have jumped out of! A skydiver’s guide. | Hush-Kit
  140. Pingback: The last Hawker: Interview with a Hawk pilot | Hush-Kit
  141. Pingback: England & The Aeroplane: An interview with historian David Edgerton | Hush-Kit
  142. Pingback: The 10 worst Royal Navy aircraft | Hush-Kit
  143. Pingback: The top ten dog-fighters of 2017 (WVR fighter aircraft assessment) UPDATED | Hush-Kit
  144. Pingback: Mirage pilot, Part 1: Mirage versus Phantom | Hush-Kit
  145. Pingback: Mirage pilot interview, Part 2: Flying & fighting | Hush-Kit
  146. Pingback: Mirage pilot interview, Part 3: Stalling, Tomcats and duelling F1s | Hush-Kit
  147. Pingback: Flying and fighting in the MiG-19: In conversation with Wg. Cdr. Irfan Masum (Part 1) | Hush-Kit
  148. Pingback: Mirage pilot interview, Part 4: The tricky art of intercepting B-52s | Hush-Kit
  149. Pingback: 10 amazing things you didn’t know about Air Force One | Hush-Kit
  150. Pingback: Mirage pilot interview, Part 5: Diamond Nine and 65,000 feet | Hush-Kit
  151. Pingback: An air force of my own #2: France 1937 | Hush-Kit
  152. Pingback: Top 10 aircraft camo schemes 2017 | Hush-Kit
  153. Pingback: Navy Growlers draw massive sky penis | Hush-Kit
  154. Pingback: Su-35 versus F-22 Raptor: Analysis from RUSI’s Justin Bronk | Hush-Kit
  155. Pingback: Top Ten Asymmetric Aircraft | Hush-Kit
  156. Pingback: A fighter pilot’s account of the F-86 Sabre – Part 1: Learning to dogfight | Hush-Kit
  157. Pingback: Red Star: The incredible story of the American Fighter owned by the Soviet air force | Hush-Kit
  158. Pingback: Top ten greatest cancelled fighters | Hush-Kit
  159. Pingback: Cancelled! Ten great fighter aircraft that never entered service | Hush-Kit
  160. Pingback: Top Ten Fighters at the outbreak of World War II | Hush-Kit
  161. Pingback: US Navy releases UFO footage: we ask former UK Ministry of Defence expert what this means | Hush-Kit
  162. Pingback: Ask the insider: Eurofighter Typhoon | Hush-Kit
  163. Pingback: Ask the insider: The Advanced Short Range Air-to-Air Missile  | Hush-Kit
  164. Pingback: YF-23 Versus YF-22: Why did USAF choose the F-22?  | Hush-Kit
  165. Pingback: Ask the expert: What does the J-20’s configuration reveal? | Hush-Kit
  166. Pingback: Ask the expert: faster helicopters and the future of rotorcraft | Hush-Kit
  167. Pingback: Interview with Distinguished Flying Cross winning Typhoon fighter pilot | Hush-Kit
  168. Pingback: Britain’s secret stealth helicopter & other exotic Westland projects | Hush-Kit
  169. Pingback: Further details emerge on Britains’s secret stealth helicopter | Hush-Kit
  170. Pingback: So how good is Pakistan’s JF-17 fighter? Analysis from RUSI think-tank’s Justin Bronk | Hush-Kit
  171. Pingback: Interview with The Aviation Historian’s Nick Stroud | Hush-Kit
  172. Pingback: The unloved giant: The Douglas XB-19 ‘Flying Behemoth’ | Hush-Kit
  173. Pingback: Fighter design contest evaluation and winners revealed | Hush-Kit
  174. Pingback: Top 10 Attack Helicopters | Hush-Kit
  175. Pingback: A fighter pilot’s account of the F-86 Sabre – Part 2: Punch! Pull! Eject! Ejection rejection | Hush-Kit
  176. Pingback: Spitfire versus Messerschmitt Bf 109: A comparison of the Spitfire and the Bf 109 in the early years of World War II | Hush-Kit
  177. Pingback: World Cup Air Forces 2018: Group Stage Opening match – Saudi Arabia versus Russia | Hush-Kit
  178. Pingback: Stingbat LHX stealth helicopter: would it have worked in real life? | Hush-Kit
  179. Pingback: Ten most important fighter aircraft guns | Hush-Kit
  180. jan's avatar
    jan

    i have a book that my father has written on the planet satellite g-al01in 1946 with all drawings and measurements and photos.

  181. Pingback: The Supersonic Rotor Helicopter | Hush-Kit
  182. Pingback: Dornier Do-31 the jump-jet tactical transport | Hush-Kit
  183. Pingback: The Northrop N-102 Fang fighter | Hush-Kit
  184. Pingback: What was the fastest ever European aircraft? | Hush-Kit
  185. Pingback: An idiot’s guide to aircraft design: Introduction | Hush-Kit
  186. Pingback: An idiot’s guide to aircraft design – Part 1: How to build the fastest-climbing fighter | Hush-Kit
  187. Pingback: An idiot’s guide to aircraft design – Part 2: How to build an aircraft with great endurance | Hush-Kit
  188. Pingback: Sea Fighters: 10 fighter planes that used the ocean as a runway | Hush-Kit
  189. Pingback: Magnificent Girls in Their Flying Machines – AMELIA EARHART: FLIGHT FASHION by Amber Jane Butchart | Hush-Kit
  190. Pingback: An idiot’s guide to aircraft design – Part 4: Manoeuvre Performance | Hush-Kit
  191. Pingback: The greatest aircraft that never were | Hush-Kit
  192. Pingback: Airbus-Dassault New Generation Fighter (NGF): what does Paris tell us? | Hush-Kit
  193. Pingback: The Turkish TF-X stealth fighter – a good idea? We ask a former British technical liaison | Hush-Kit
  194. Pingback: Aircraft design contest 2019 launched | Hush-Kit
  195. Pingback: Flying & fighting in the Sukhoi Su-30 ‘Flanker’: A pilot interview | Hush-Kit
  196. Pingback: Convair Kingfish: Stealthy Mach 4 at 75,000 feet | Hush-Kit
  197. Pingback: Top 10 coolest air forces | Hush-Kit
  198. Pingback: Who would win if a Eurofighter Typhoon fought a Spitfire? This and other questions to a Spitfire and Typhoon pilot | Hush-Kit
  199. Pingback: Airlifters of the world, unite and take over! An idiot’s guide to today’s modern military transport aircraft | Hush-Kit
  200. Pingback: Interview with Soviet air force Su-15 ‘Flagon’ fighter pilot: Defending the USSR | Hush-Kit
  201. Pingback: The Soviet missile used by the US Navy | Hush-Kit
  202. Pingback: Eurocanards compared | Hush-Kit
  203. Pingback: Top 10 Close Air Support aircraft | Hush-Kit
  204. Pingback: New top story on Hacker News: Planet Satellite: British super-plane or magnesium flop? – Golden News
  205. Pingback: New top story on Hacker News: Planet Satellite: British super-plane or magnesium flop? – News about world
  206. Pingback: New top story on Hacker News: Planet Satellite: British super-plane or magnesium flop? – protipsss
  207. Pingback: New top story on Hacker News: Planet Satellite: British super-plane or magnesium flop? – Ultimate News
  208. Pingback: New top story on Hacker News: Planet Satellite: British super-plane or magnesium flop? – Hckr News
  209. Pingback: New top story on Hacker News: Planet Satellite: British super-plane or magnesium flop? – Outside The Know
  210. Pingback: New top story on Hacker News: Planet Satellite: British super-plane or magnesium flop? – Latest news
  211. Pingback: Planet Satellite: British super-plane or magnesium flop? – INDIA NEWS
  212. Pingback: Planet Satellite: British super-plane or magnesium flop? – Tom Good, PGA Golf Instructor
  213. Pingback: Hush-Kit meets Secret Projects Paul Martell-Mead | Hush-Kit
  214. Pingback: Cancelled American bombers | Hush-Kit
  215. Pingback: Cancelled American bombers - VEHICLE News
  216. Pingback: Britain’s ‘Budget X-15’ or Manned Blue Steel | Hush-Kit
  217. Pingback: An Unmanly Guide to Pilotless Aircraft | Hush-Kit
  218. Pingback: An Unmanly Guide to Pilotless Aircraft | Hush-Kit
  219. Pingback: I flew the most secret MiG fighter in the world for the US Air Force: Red Eagle pilot gives the low-down on America’s MiG-21 ‘Fishbed’ | Hush-Kit
  220. Pingback: Cancelled British airliners | Hush-Kit

Leave a Reply to janCancel reply