The RF-4C: Last Manned USAF Tactical Reconnaissance Aircraft by Col. Eileen Bjorkman

Photo 1_RF-4C_68-0568_at_Zweibrucken_Air_Base,_West_Germany The McDonnell RF-4C ruled the tactical reconnaissance skies for the U.S. Air Force from 1964 through the early 1990s. The aircraft’s main job was the first step of John Boyd’s famous OODA loop—observe, orient, decide, act, repeat. After all, you can’t even get started without observing. And before remotely piloted vehicles came on the scene, the best way to get near-instantaneous information over a specific target was to send in manned tactical reconnaissance aircraft. Designed to overcome shortcomings of the RF-101, rather than just hang a bunch of cameras on an existing F-4 models, engineers went back to the drawing board and lengthened the existing F-4 nose to fit in sophisticated sensors: film and infrared cameras, along with an advanced side-looking radar. The longer-nosed variant also became the basis for the F-4E model. The YRF-4C prototype first flew on August 9, 1963 and the first production aircraft flew May 18, 1964, followed shortly after by deliveries to Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina. Although a weapon systems operator (WSO) later flew in the rear cockpit, the USAF initially used two pilots, funneling an inexperienced pilot into the rear cockpit as a Pilot Systems Operator, abbreviated as PSO and pronounced ‘pay-so.’ After initial training, pilots moved to the first operational squadron to fly the RF-4C, the 16th Tactical Reconnaissance Squadron (TRS), also at Shaw. On October 27, 1965, 16th TRS pilots ferried nine aircraft to Vietnam, landing at Tan Son Nhut Air Base near Saigon on October 31. RF-4Cs later arrived at Udorn Royal Thai AFB in Thailand. Photo 2_Rf-4c-14trs-udon A typical reconnaissance mission in Vietnam might include taking pictures of trucks destroyed along the Ho Chi Minh Trail. Enemy gunners on the ground often waited for the RF-4C crews as they neared a target and crews quickly developed deceptive manoeuvres to counter the gunners. Pilots climbed to a high altitude after takeoff, but nearing a target, they descended to 3,500 feet to both give them good photo coverage and keep them above 50-caliber machine gun range. About three miles from the target, the front-seat pilot yanked into a 75-degree bank turn and then rolled out, held it for 15 seconds, then did another rapid turn and roll out, and then turned on the radar for one second to make the North Vietnamese think the aircraft was headed someplace else. The whole sky still filled with bullets, but the maneuvering largely kept aircraft from harm. AR.2012.027 Recce crews also discovered that the RF-4C was surprisingly speedy and could outrun many threats. Designers had expected the new airframe to have more drag than the earlier models, but the opposite was true. However, crews often couldn’t take full advantage of that speed over North Vietnam—cruising faster than 480 knots made navigation harder, increased fuel consumption, and the increased turn radius made threat evasion maneuver less effective. In addition, the RF-4C’s fighter escorts, often heavily laden with external munitions, couldn’t keep up at the higher speeds. For defenses against surface-to-air missiles, the RF-4C had chaff dispensers on the rear of the aircraft to fool the radar guided missiles and a radar warning receiver in the cockpit that alerted pilots to a lock-on and launch via chirping in headsets and cockpit displays. Pilots could often outmaneuver the missiles, and with two engines, even a damaged aircraft could sometimes limp home or make it out over the Gulf of Tonkin where an ejection was more likely to result in a rescue. Not everyone was so lucky, though. On August 12, 1967, an RF-4C from the 11th TRS flying from Udorn was hit by a SAM, forcing the crew to eject (see USAF photo 4 below). Captains Edward Atterbury and Thomas Parrot were captured; Atterbury later died after an escape attempt and Parrott was released in 1973 after the war ended. The RF-4C had important Cold War missions as well, including Peacetime Aerial Reconnaissance Program (PARPRO) flights along the DMZ between North and South Korea. To peer into North Korea, crews used a telephoto camera mounted in a monstrous “Bench Box” pod hung so low under the fuselage that pilots had to be careful not to snag arresting cables at the end of the runway.

Sadly, this site will pause operations in June if it does not hit its funding targets. If you’ve enjoyed an article you can donate here.

Additional upgrades sustained the RF-4C into the 1990s: improved navigation equipment, the Pave Tack laser targeting system, a terrain following system, and the Tactical Electronic Reconnaissance (TEREC) system, a pod loaded with radar detection equipment for locating SAM sites. The TEREC system, although highly capable, moved the aircraft’s center of gravity aft, which may have contributed to several mishaps in the 1980s. Pilots and WSOs quickly became wary of the system. By the 1980s, the aircraft were ageing rapidly and becoming difficult to maintain, including the RF-4Cs that I flew in at Edwards AFB, California as a flight test engineer. We had quite a few Tactical Air Command (TAC) “hand-me-down” RF-4Cs; the cameras in three of them had been removed to make room for flight test instrumentation to support USAF Test Pilot School training flights and other test activities, such as safety and photo chase. One aircraft even had my name stenciled under the rear canopy. TAC pushed many other RF-4Cs into Air National Guard units as well, where they picked up new missions that included drug interdiction and disaster relief. Photo 5_Eileen Bjorkman-RF-4C As unmanned reconnaissance aircraft began to debut, the RF-4Cs began heading for the boneyard at Davis-Monthan AFB, but the aircraft had a brief renaissance in 1991 during Desert Storm, after commanders realized they didn’t yet have enough unmanned aircraft to do the first part of the OODA loop. RF-4Cs stationed at Zweibrucken Air Base, Germany, about to head to the boneyard, were diverted to the Gulf instead. The RF-4Cs that I flew at Edwards have scattered and I don’t know where all of them are. Two are on display in Quartzsite, Arizona. Another Edwards RF-4C, referred to as ‘Balls Four,’ suffered a hydraulic failure in 1965 while assigned to a TAC unit; the resulting hard landing punched one strut through a wing and damaged the other strut. The aircraft apparently never fully recovered from its landing incident and wound up at Eglin AFB, Florida as a test support aircraft and then later moved to Edwards, where it had a reputation as a hangar queen. RF-4C is now on display at Edwards and will eventually be moved into the Air Force Flight Test Museum when its new building is constructed. Support Hush-Kit with our high quality aviation themed merchandise here
This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is screenshot-2020-11-18-at-14.18.18.png
Photo 6_RF-4C 004 For more information on the RF-4C and some great pilot and WSO stories, please see my full article that first appeared in Aviation History last year. Eileen Bjorkman is a retired U.S. Air Force colonel and former flight test engineer who writes about aviation history. Her second book, Unforgotten in the Gulf of Tonkin: A Story of the U.S. Military’s Commitment to Leave No One Behind, will be released on September 1, 2020. RF-4C

Beautiful coffee-table book on warplanes. Support the crowdfunded Hush-Kit Book of Warplanes by pre-ordering your copy of our book here 

From the cocaine, blood and flying scarves of World War One dogfighting to the dark arts of modern air combat, here is an enthralling ode to these brutally exciting killing machines. The Hush-Kit Book of Warplanes is a beautifully designed, highly visual, collection of the best articles from the fascinating world of military aviation –hand-picked from the highly acclaimed Hush-kit online magazine (and mixed with a heavy punch of new exclusive material). It is packed with a feast of material, ranging from interviews with fighter pilots (including the English Electric Lightning, stealthy F-35B and Mach 3 MiG-25 ‘Foxbat’), to wicked satire, expert historical analysis, top 10s and all manner of things aeronautical, from the site described as HUSHKITPLANES_SPREADS4_4.jpg“the thinking-man’s Top Gear… but for planes”. The solid well-researched information about aeroplanes is brilliantly combined with an irreverent attitude and real insight into the dangerous romantic world of combat aircraft. HUSHKITPLANES_SPREADS4_6.jpg FEATURING
  • Interviews with pilots of the F-14 Tomcat, Mirage, Typhoon, MiG-25, MiG-27, English Electric Lighting, Harrier, F-15, B-52 and many more.
  • Engaging Top (and bottom) 10s including: Greatest fighter aircraft of World War II, Worst British aircraft, Worst Soviet aircraft and many more insanely specific ones.
  • Expert analysis of weapons, tactics and technology.
  • ssdd.jpg
  • A look into art and culture’s love affair with the aeroplane.
  • Bizarre moments in aviation history.
  • Fascinating insights into exceptionally obscure warplanes.
  • Pre-order your copy here

Photo 5_Eileen Bjorkman-RF-4C

28 comments

  1. Todd Brock

    I worked on the RF-4C from late ’83 to late ’87 on Okinawa (18th CRS); specifically on the AN/ALQ-125 TEREC system. It wasn’t a pod. Rather, it consisted of 13 LRUs scattered from the forward camera bay (a stacked reel to reel tape recorder) to the bay behind the WSO (the computer controlling the system and integrating with the ARN-101 nav system). The two receivers (the biggest LRUs) were mounted in the SLR bays on each side.

    • Ragnarredbeard

      I was an intel airman in the 15TRS from 83 to 86. I was gonna ring in on the TEREC as well, but you beat me to it. IIRC, we had about half a dozen TEREC birds in the squadron and they didn’t fly photo missions much (if at all).

      The podded system was most likely the big camera for the DMZ runs.

      • TB

        emitters had a number on the control panel. The number that would be displayed was limited to the top ten. You could program as many as you were willing to type it. Anything past 10 showed up as a U and went onto tape.
        Did you know Larry Hultberg?

      • trehis

        The ones in Germany (Zweibruecken) flew mainly photo missions and only about 6-8 ELINT missions a month.

    • Todd Brock

      TEREC only linked to two external systems. It got location data from the ARN-101 and datalinked through the UHF radio.

      • Ragnarredbeard

        I used to sit in the 15TRS during TEREC missions and plot the priority emitters as they came off the printer. Was a lot of fun in those days.

  2. William

    The first fight I worked on as a crew chief was the RF-4c at Shaw in 1982. Even though me and my fellow new arrivals to Shaw were “trained-up” on the reccie, we were ostensibly brought in to function as the new ground maintainence teams for the base’s conversion to a tactical fighter wing flying F-16c/d models.

    Even though I only worked on the Phantom for ~6 months, the experience gave me (and us) a broad grounding in challenges of fighter maintainence. I can honestly say that though brief, that 6 months made me better at my job as an F-16 then, 2 years later, an F-15 crew chief.

    • Todd Brock

      The Intel team identified them on the load sheets provided to the maintainers. We entered them into the system using the a test set that connected into the system.

    • Todd Brock

      There were 10 priority signals (as I recall). The RSO had a sheet given to him by the TRS Intel flt. that broke them out. You could program in many more than the top ten, I can’t recall how many. The most we ever put in was about 20 when looking for a unique target set with a lot of radars in one area.

  3. Pingback: The RF-4C: Last Manned USAF Tactical Reconnaissance Aircraft by Col. Eileen Bjorkman | Hush-Kit
  4. george galvez

    i build the first Fly A Way kit for the RF-4C at Shaw AFB S.C. in 1965 for 16th tactical recon wing after coming back from Okinawa during the start of the NAM war . 363rd was flying RF-101 and RB-66 .

  5. Rob

    I was with the 38th TAC Recon Sq from 78 – 81 in Sunny Zwei. I worked on the TEREC system but remember very little about it. I was one of the airman that worked with an officer demoing it’s capabilities back in the day. Good time!

  6. john krems

    While stationed at RAF Upper Heyford from 1977-82/F-111E we would get a call from Job Control of incoming RF-4’s from Alconbury and have to perform a “Hat Rack/War Time Turn”, download of camera systems with engines running and this had to be accomplished within a certain time frame. I only had this small relations with this aircraft until I got stationed at Bergstrom AFB/Austin Tx from 1988-1990. I preferred my F-15’s over this aircraft any day.

Leave a comment